<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to merging with SVN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microshell.com/programming/general-algorithm/introduction-to-merging-with-svn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microshell.com/programming/general-algorithm/introduction-to-merging-with-svn/</link>
	<description>Learn something share something</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:06:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maresa</title>
		<link>http://www.microshell.com/programming/general-algorithm/introduction-to-merging-with-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1933</link>
		<dc:creator>Maresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microshell.com/?p=879#comment-1933</guid>
		<description>Yes ... SVN 1.6.x does support merging .. hence we don&#039;t have to use svnmerge.py anymore. There are plenty of cases where distributions doesn&#039;t have SVN 1.6 yet. In particular Ubuntu Hardy (the distribution I&#039;m using). Even if you&#039;re using SVN 1.6, it doesn&#039;t mean that you can&#039;t still use svnmerge.py though. I have a feeling that I would still be using svnmerge.py even though I&#039;m using SVN 1.6 just because I&#039;m already familiar with it. Maybe once svnmerge.py is no longer maintained, I&#039;d be forced to use SVN 1.6 built in merging feature :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8230; SVN 1.6.x does support merging .. hence we don&#8217;t have to use svnmerge.py anymore. There are plenty of cases where distributions doesn&#8217;t have SVN 1.6 yet. In particular Ubuntu Hardy (the distribution I&#8217;m using). Even if you&#8217;re using SVN 1.6, it doesn&#8217;t mean that you can&#8217;t still use svnmerge.py though. I have a feeling that I would still be using svnmerge.py even though I&#8217;m using SVN 1.6 just because I&#8217;m already familiar with it. Maybe once svnmerge.py is no longer maintained, I&#8217;d be forced to use SVN 1.6 built in merging feature <img src='http://www.microshell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriele Vivinetto</title>
		<link>http://www.microshell.com/programming/general-algorithm/introduction-to-merging-with-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriele Vivinetto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microshell.com/?p=879#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>I think this is not needed woth svn 1.6.x, because it saves merge history in the svn:property mergeinfo.
Am I wrong ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is not needed woth svn 1.6.x, because it saves merge history in the svn:property mergeinfo.<br />
Am I wrong ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
